An independent research preview · covering the California Community Colleges
Environmental Scan
AI Landscape by Region
Spring 2025 baseline · June 2026 update
← All colleges & districts

College of the Redwoods

Region: North Far North

At a glance

College of the Redwoods formed a joint Academic Senate/Administration AI Task Force in October 2025, tri-chaired by Dean Alan Price, Professor Susan Gehr, and Giselle Cabrero, with working subcommittees now active on student services and equity. The college has no campus-wide AI policy but encourages faculty to set syllabus-level guidelines; librarian Gehr maintains evolving AI resources, and the Financial Aid Office is piloting the statewide Cali chatbot for student engagement.

Updated Scan Findings

6 new 🆕· 8 source-verified findings from the updated web scan
AI-Engaged People, Processes & Timelines · 3
  • 🆕Joint Academic Senate/Administration AI Task Force formed (Oct 2025). In October 2025 CR established a joint Academic Senate/Administration AI Task Force to 'assess and make recommendations for the future of Generative AI in education and administrative functions at CR,' research effective practices, and develop proposals to amplify learning/research outcomes while preventing misuse. Tri-chairs are Dean Dr. Alan Price, Professor Susan Gehr, and Giselle Cabrero, with faculty, administrators, managers, classified staff, and one ASCR student representative. 2025 · high confidencesource
  • 🆕AI Task Force Student Services & Equity subcommittee active (Jan 2026). At the January 6, 2026 Board meeting, the Student Services & Equity subcommittee of the AI Task Force (including Management Council representatives Heidi Bareilles and Anthony Finck) reported on its work, indicating the task force has organized into working subcommittees. 2026 · high confidencesource
  • 🆕Fall 2025 convocation AI keynote and ChatGPT workshop. CR's August 21, 2025 convocation featured keynote speaker Dr. Deone Zell (an AI Faculty Fellow) on 'AI & the Future,' plus AI-related breakout sessions including 'ChatGPT and Your Workflow: It's Not Skynet...Yet.' 2025 · high confidencesource
AI Policies · 1
  • No campus-wide AI policy; instructors encouraged to set syllabus AI policy. The college states there is 'currently no campus-wide policy for AI use in the classroom' and is 'encouraging instructors to include AI use policies in the syllabus,' advising students to check with each instructor since rules vary by class. 2025 · high confidencesource
AI Courses, Tools & Resources · 4
  • 🆕Financial Aid Office piloting 'Cali' AI chatbot (2025-2026). CR's Financial Aid Office is participating in a pilot of Cali Bot, a text-based AI student-engagement/communication tool supported by the California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office (Digital Center) in partnership with Mainstay and the California Student Aid Commission; CR is named as one of three rural pilot colleges (with Butte and Lassen). 2026 · high confidencesource
  • 🆕Named participant in statewide Cali financial-aid chatbot pilot (Fall 2025). The California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office AI initiative page lists 'College of the Redwoods' among the rural colleges in the Fall 2025 Cali AI-powered student engagement chatbot pilot, developed by the CCC Digital Center in partnership with the California Student Aid Commission (provider Mainstay). Fall 2025 · high confidencesource
  • 🆕AI cited as driver of future institutional assessment. At the December 16, 2025 Board meeting, the President noted the future of institutional assessment is 'poised for significant transformation, driven by the integration of artificial intelligence,' as part of convening a group to consider the future of assessment at CR. 2025 · high confidencesource
  • Library 'Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom' LibGuide (updated Sept 2025). Librarian Susan Gehr maintains a LibGuide covering generative AI, academic integrity, ChatGPT and citations, copyright, sample classroom AI policies, detection tools (GPTZero, OpenAI classifier), and educator professional-development resources; it remains a 'work in progress' last updated September 2, 2025. 2025 · high confidencesource

Spring 2025 baseline

AI-Engaged People, Processes & Timelines

V2030: PeopleV2030: PolicyV2030: ResourcesV2030: Systems
Team/Lead: College of the Redwoods/Senate, Admin, and Professor Susan Gehr, Library
  • Academic Senate, administration at work with faculty and staff, also Interested in AI microcredential
  • Librarian Susan Gehr created Library Guides
  • Rely on the Guides from librarian Alison Gurganus of Mesa College for sharing her guid
  • Academic Senate Sample Syllabus policies: [“There is no official CR policy on AI use. It is up to the instructor how they would like to address AI use in their courses. Below are three sample policies for you to consider, adapt, or delete”.] Three Approaches
  • NO AI: Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have made large language models such as ChatGPT and Google's Bard widely available. However, overuse of these tools in this class can undermine your learning and curtail the development of your critical and creative thinking skills. In addition, AI outputs are often unreliable and frequently subject to bias. For these reasons, the policy of this class is that AI cannot be used at any point in the completion of class assignments, including discussion posts. Any or all of your assignment submissions and discussion posts may be screened by AI detection software, but the real penalty for AI misuse is that you will miss out on an opportunity to learn.
  • Per Assignment: Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have made large language models such as ChatGPT and Google's Bard widely available. Sometimes, using these tools appropriately can help us overcome barriers and allow us to focus on deeper learning. However, overuse of these tools can undermine the development of our critical and creative thinking skills. In addition, AI outputs are often unreliable and frequently subject to bias. For these reasons, it is sometimes appropriate and sometimes inappropriate to use generative AI in the completion of assignments or in discussion posts. For this class, please see the specific assignment instructions for guidance on how and when generative AI tools may be used appropriately as we're working on and learning from a particular assignment. Also, please keep in mind that you are responsible for anything you submit; please carefully review all AI-generated outputs, screening them for accuracy, bias, appropriateness, and fidelity to your perspective.
  • Liberal AI: Generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT and Google's Bard, are likely to be widely used in the workplace moving forward. It's important for you to understand how to use them ethically and effectively. For that reason, in this class, you will sometimes be invited to use such a tool in the completion of an assignment. In this class, using generative AI tools is not cheating if the outputs are screened by you for accuracy, bias, appropriateness, and fidelity to your perspective.

AI Policies

V2030: Policy
Team/Lead: College of the Redwoods
  • College-wide policy not yet found.
  • Academic Senate Sample Syllabus policies
  • Some departments:
  • [[“There is no official CR policy on AI use. It is up to the instructor how they would like to address AI use in their courses. Below are three sample policies for you to consider, adapt, or delete”.]](https://www.redwoods.edu/fs/syllabi/psych/2024S-PSYCH%2033-D6272-Freneau.pdf)
  • Range from NO AI, by assignment AI, or AI okay.
  • Per library:
  • Special note to students: your best practice will be to check-in with your instructors about class policy around AI use. Currently, there is no campus-wide policy for AI use in the classroom, but faculty are aware of the issues and CR is encouraging instructors to include AI use policies in the syllabus. There will be quite a bit of variability in how faculty do or don't incorporate AI into coursework. What is okay in one class may not be in another class.
  • Relies on current academic integrity policy, per professor. CoR faculty syllabus language models include a spectrum of AI inclusion and explicitly allowance for certain assignments to all assignments with citation and warning:
  • Cardenas, Business 10
  • McKendry, Business 35

AI Courses, Tools & Resources

V2030: Resources
Team/Lead: College of the Redwoods

Entities from the knowledge graph

college: College of the Redwoodsinitiative: AI Microcredentialorganization: College of the Redwoods Academic Senateorganization: College of the Redwoods Libraryorganization: University of Pennsylvaniaperson: Susan Gehrperson: Cardenasperson: McKendryperson: Ryan Bakerpolicy: College of the Redwoods Academic Senate Sample Syllabus AI Policies

Links & artifacts

Contacts at this college

Name / RoleEmailPhone
SG
Susan Gehr
Librarian
(707) 476-4260
CA
Cardenas
Business 10 Instructor
MC
McKendry
Business 35 Instructor
laurrie-mckendry@redwoods.edu
RB
Ryan Baker
Professor